The Entry Point
Where technology is admitted into the strategy process — and what has already been fixed by the time it arrives.
Explore the ideaSignal & Structure Press · Available — Current Book
Why Strategy Fails When Technology Enters Too Late
The technology problem often begins before technology enters the room.
Why organisations make strategic decisions without technology, discover the consequences during execution, and then blame IT for the result.
Signal & Structure Press
The Cost Centre in the Corner
Why Strategy Fails When Technology Enters Too Late
Henny Schlebusch, Pr.CIO
Cover artwork placeholder
The central problem
The room
Strategy happens here.
The executive table. Investment cases, acquisitions, deadlines, operating models and commitments to the market.
The corner
Technology sits here.
Downstream of the decision. Measured on delivery, cost and uptime — not on the judgement that produced the work.
By the time technology is invited in, the organisation may already have committed to the cost, architecture, deadline and operating model.
That is the cost centre in the corner.
Readership
Who want technology investment tied to business outcomes.
Who need to distinguish technology cost from the cost of strategic decisions.
Who are accountable for outcomes they were not involved in shaping.
Who need technology inside strategy rather than downstream from it.
The sequence
Nothing in this sequence is unreasonable on its own. The difficulty is the order in which it happens.
01
The business decides what it wants to achieve.
02
Budgets, acquisitions, deadlines and operating models become fixed.
03
04
Legacy systems. Integration. Cybersecurity. Data. Architecture. Capability.
05
Technology becomes accountable for decisions it did not help make.
Inside the book
Five arguments that run through the book — each of them written for the people who make the decision, not only for the people who implement it.
How organisations unintentionally position IT as an implementation function rather than a strategic capability.
And why simply relabelling technology as “investment” does not solve the underlying problem.
The difference between involving technology before strategic commitment and asking it to execute afterwards.
Technology leadership has also contributed to its own strategic exclusion.
Practical approaches for bringing technological consequence into strategic decision-making earlier.
The argument, drawn
The figures that carry the argument, presented as a growing reference rather than a sales page.
Where technology is admitted into the strategy process — and what has already been fixed by the time it arrives.
Explore the ideaHow the cost of changing a decision rises while the organisation’s confidence in it rises faster.
Explore the ideaThe distance between the people who make a decision and the people who are measured on its outcome.
Explore the ideaEndorsements
Placeholder endorsement — replace with a genuine quotation once it has been supplied and approved.
Placeholder endorsement — replace with a genuine quotation once it has been supplied and approved.
Placeholder endorsement — replace with a genuine quotation once it has been supplied and approved.
Placeholder endorsement — additional endorsements appear in the expandable area below.
Signal & Structure Press
The Cost Centre in the Corner
Why Strategy Fails When Technology Enters Too Late
Henny Schlebusch, Pr.CIO
Cover artwork placeholder
Order the book
The Cost Centre in the Corner
Why Strategy Fails When Technology Enters Too Late
Speaking & executive engagement
The argument in the book works hardest in the room it was written about — with the executive team, before the next commitment is made.
Invite Henny to SpeakWhy Strategy Fails When Technology Enters Too Late
Technology as a strategic decision capability
Identifying where technology enters your strategy process
For leadership teams, conferences and executive programmes
Writing
Investment7 min read
The IT budget records where the money is spent. It says almost nothing about which decisions made the spend inevitable.
ReadOperating Model5 min read
A refusal late in the process is usually a constraint surfacing late — not an objection being raised early.
ReadArchitecture8 min read
Acquisitions, deadlines and commercial commitments are architectural decisions. They are simply not recorded as such.
ReadGovernance6 min read
None of them are technical. All of them determine whether the strategy is executable.
Read